9/2/2023 0 Comments Define lattice mathDetermine the lattices (L 2, ≤), where L 2=L x L. Theorem: Prove that every finite lattice L =. If L is a bounded lattice, then for any element a ∈ L, we have the following identities: The set of +ve integer I + under the usual order of ≤ is not a bounded lattice since it has a least element 1 but the greatest element does not exist.The power set P(S) of the set S under the operations of intersection and union is a bounded lattice since ∅ is the least element of P(S) and the set S is the greatest element of P(S).The dual of any statement in a lattice (L,∧ ,∨ ) is defined to be a statement that is obtained by interchanging ∧ an ∨.įor example, the dual of a ∧ (b ∨ a) = a ∨ a isĪ lattice L is called a bounded lattice if it has greatest element 1 and a least element 0. (a) a ∧ ( a ∨ b) = a (b) a ∨ ( a ∧ b) = a Duality: Then L is called a lattice if the following axioms hold where a, b, c are elements in L: Phys.Let L be a non-empty set closed under two binary operations called meet and join, denoted by ∧ and ∨. Riečanová, Z.: Generalization of blocks for D-lattices and lattice-ordered effect algebras. ISBN 0-7923-6471-6įoulis, D.J., Bennett, M.K.: Effect algebras and unsharp quantum logics. Slovaca (to appear)ĭi Nola, A., Russo, C.: The semiring-theoretic approach to MV-algebras: A survey. doi: 10.1007/s1108-7Ĭhajda, I., Länger, H.: A triple representation of lattice effect algebras. (Szeged) 81, 361–374 (2015)Ĭhajda, I., Länger, H.: Coupled right orthosemirings induced by orthomodular lattices. Algebra Universalis 60, 63–90 (2009)Ĭhajda, I., Länger, H.: A representation of basic algebras by coupled right near semirings. A lattice is a partially ordered set in which every pair of elements possesses a greatest lower bound and a least upper bound within the set. Thereforeīelluce, L.P., Di Nola, A., Ferraioli, A.R.: MV-semirings and their sheaf representations. Hence there exist b ′⊕ c ′ and a ′⊕( b ′⊕ c ′) and ( a ′⊕ b ′)⊕ c ′ = a ′⊕( b ′⊕ c ′). Then there exists a ′⊕ b ′, a b=( a ′⊕ b ′) ′ and there exists ( a ′⊕ b ′)⊕ c ′. Hence the following are equivalent: a≤ b, b ′≤ a ′, a ′∧ b ′ = b ′, b⊕( a ′∧ b ′)=1, ( a ′∧ b ′)⊕ b=1, (( a ′∧ b ′)⊕ b) ′=0, a b ′=0.Īccording to (N2) the following are equivalent: a ′ b ′=0, a ′≤ b, a ′⊕ b ′ exists. We will call such algebras effect near a0 & = & ((a^)\).īy (E3) we have that a ′∧ b ′ = b ′ implies b⊕( a ′∧ b ′) = b⊕ b ′=1 and, conversely, if b⊕( a ′∧ b ′)=1 then a ′∧ b ′ = b ′. Similarly as in, we ask them to satisfy six more natural axioms. These algebras seem to be an appropriate tool when equipped with an involution. The concept of a right near semiring was introduced by the authors in. The fact that the binary operation in effect algebras is only partial and that one cannot suppose that, whenever extended to a total operation, it would remain commutative and associative, motivated us to use so-called right near semirings instead of semirings. The motivation for such a representation by means of semiring-like structures is practically the same as in. These facts encouraged us to try a similar approach also for lattice effect algebras. in and it was further developed by Di Nola and Russo in. A representation of MV-algebras by means of semiring-like structures, so-called MV-semirings, was already published by Belluce et al. It was proved by Riečanová that every lattice effect algebra is built up by blocks which are MV-algebras.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |